Anytalk mac for free#Same thing for nVidia, they created a GPU Rendering API (Optix), released it for free and someone rolled that into a Product (FurryBall) - failed miserably, and famously crashed while running live at Siggraph. Look, AMD creates GPU's for a living and authored their own GPU Rendering API (Radeon Rays), and their GPU Renderer is crap (ProRender) - that's how hard it is to make a Production GPU renderer. ChaosGroup should absolutely own this GPU rendering market, hands down. The fact still remains, if you look at VRay, and the over 10 years head start they had in the GPU rendering research/development sector, it should be clear, just how extremely difficult it is to author a Production GPU renderer. Redshift showed what can be done on the GPU, in terms of speed and production workflow support. USD is the future - you get a scenegraph that resolves directly on the GPU, and thus, a storage format (USD) that can be rendered directly on the GPU (Hydra). Solaris is not a Mantra GPU - it is simply a highly customized Hydra port. Well, I would celebrate it, if it would offer rendering to both sides, let it be a red, green or upcomung blue gpu. Midhpase mentioned the misterious “Solaris” as Mantra's GPU render app. One of the reasons why I was an octane fun, that they promissed so called “democratizeing 3D rendering” - even if they mentioned it due to their ORC system and render tookens, well… it's still can use JUST CUDA cores, their answer due to the lack of AMD gpu utilization was: “all of our contacts left AMD” (hahah thats big) the up to 2 GPU free version is not even on the horizont (beside inside unity)but long story short, I do not see it as a healthy industry where we can buy GPUs just from one company, since redshift and octane, the two “big” gpu render engines are using just CUDA (and now some tensore cores)I'm an Nvidia user for more than 10 years, but I would like to take a walk on the red side sometimes, but I never was able to… (befor due to adobe and premier's only cuda support, now due to octane, redshift) So THAT IS WHY I support AMD ProRender! Not becouse it's stable, no, it's incredible unstable and bugged right now, but as Filipw mentioned above, they have AMD behind them vs some other open sorce renders like LuxCore or EEVEE that offers gpu render solution not just on Nvidia chips. Anytalk mac pro#Based on my experiences I share the opinion above that amd pro render is quite buggy, redshift is the most stable but it's a biased render, octane is unbiased, pathtracing system (I was an octane fun till 0.4 release) but I left them since a few month - they promised way too much that was not fulfilled. I my self tried octane, redshift, eevee and amd pro render (as gpu renders).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |